hslu-ki-h2501

Part 3 — Perception: From Data to Experience

Learning materials

3.1 Conceptual Introduction — Perceiving Machines?

Artificial Intelligence “perceives” the world through sensors and data inputs — it processes information, recognizes patterns, and makes predictions. But can it truly experience what it perceives?

Philosophers have long debated whether perception creates reality, or merely interprets it. Two thinkers, George Berkeley and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, offer powerful frameworks to question AI perception:

Guiding question: Does AI perceive the world, or does it merely compute it?

3.2 Application Topics — Connecting Philosophy and AI

1. AI Perception vs. Human Perception

2. Virtual Reality and Simulation

3. Embodied AI and Robotics

4. AI–Human Interaction

3.3 Philosophical Lenses — Berkeley and Merleau-Ponty

George Berkeley – Idealism and AI Perception

Key Idea:

“To be is to be perceived.” Objects exist only insofar as they are perceived by a mind.

Applications:

  1. AI Perception vs. Human Perception: If AI does not process data, does that data “exist” for it? Compare to Berkeley’s idea that objects cease to exist when unperceived.

  2. Virtual Reality and AI: Explore how virtual environments challenge Berkeley’s immaterialism. When AI operates in simulation, does it “create” or “discover” its world?

Discussion Cue:

Is AI’s “world” real, or only real within its data stream?

Maurice Merleau-Ponty – The Embodied Mind

Key Idea:

The perceiver and the perceived world cannot be disentangled. Perception is embodied — rooted in physical, lived experience.

Applications:

  1. Embodied AI and Robotics: Apply Merleau-Ponty’s view to robotic perception. How does a robot’s body shape its understanding of space, form, and movement?

  2. AI and Human Interaction: Perception happens between perceivers — not just inside one. Examine AI systems that adapt through interaction with humans (voice assistants, adaptive robots).

Discussion Cue:

Can AI achieve a kind of “embodied perception” through interaction, even without human-like consciousness?

3.4 Discussion and Reflection — Thinking Like a Philosopher

Before moving to the practical activities reflect and debate these questions:

  1. Can an AI have an experience of the world, or only data about it?
  2. If an AI stops receiving input, does its “world” disappear — like Berkeley’s unperceived object?
  3. Would giving AI a body (robotic, sensory) make it closer to Merleau-Ponty’s embodied subject?
  4. What does this comparison reveal about human consciousness and perception?

3.5 Synthesis — AI, Perception, and Reality

Aspect Human Perception AI Perception
Nature Embodied, sensory, subjective Data-driven, computational
Relation to World Interdependent — shaped by action One-directional — world as data input
Continuity Continuous and experiential Discrete and episodic
Awareness Conscious and interpretive Non-conscious and procedural

Takeaway: AI can simulate perception, but it does not live perception.
Berkeley and Merleau-Ponty invite us to question whether “perception” without experience is perception at all.

🧠 Mini-activity idea: Map out “what AI perceives” vs. “what humans perceive” in a diagram — and discuss what’s missing in each.

3.6 Transition to Practice

3.7 Readings